Kenneth D

October 1, 2026

10 min

Does IM8 Work? Beckham’s Supplement vs. the Science

Does IM8 Work? Beckham’s Supplement vs. the Science
“Clinically Proven,” reads IM8’s science page, next to four big numbers: 95% more energy, 80% better sleep, 85% less bloating, 75% sharper focus. We traced each piece back to its source — the trial registry, IM8’s own Supplement Facts panels, and the peer-reviewed research — and found three problems anyone can verify.
What the evidence supports: IM8’s NSF Certified for Sport status is real and verifiable, and two of its headline ingredients, berberine and astaxanthin, have solid human trials behind them at studied doses.

What’s overstated or unsupported:
“Clinically proven” rests on an unpublished, company-sponsored trial with no placebo that tested a formula IM8 has since replaced. The ingredient science is borrowed from studies using far higher doses, and IM8’s science page lists three ingredients its label doesn’t.

⚕️ LyfeiQ Score: 4/10 — A clean, well-tested multivitamin at a premium price, not a proven energy, gut, or longevity product.

Where Do IM8’s “Clinically Proven” Numbers Come From?

All four percentages trace back to one company-sponsored study, and its public registry record tells a more modest story. IM8 is a supplement line from Prenetics, co-founded with David Beckham and launched in November 2024. Its flagship, Daily Ultimate Essentials, is a berry-flavored powder the company says contains 90 ingredients, sold for $89 a month on subscription. According to ClinicalTrials.gov entry NCT06655597, Prenetics sponsored the trial, planned to enroll 60 adults, and compared the powder with a “usual diet” arm that received nothing. Only the investigator was masked, so participants knew whether they were drinking the supplement.

That matters for self-reported outcomes like energy and bloating. To qualify, people had to self-identify as having fatigue and abdominal issues. Recruit people at a low point, ask them weeks later whether they feel better, and most will say yes, whatever they drank.

  • The registered primary outcome was body morphology (BMI and waist and thigh circumference). Energy was a secondary, questionnaire-based outcome. Sleep, focus, and bloating aren’t registered outcomes.
  • No results have been posted, and the record hasn’t been updated since October 2024.
  • The trial began in October 2024, so it tested the original formula. In February 2026, IM8 reformulated the powder as “PRO,” quadrupling its longevity blend and changing several doses. The percentages now sit beside a product that wasn’t studied.
  • IM8 has published two different sets of figures. At launch, NutraIngredients reported 93% felt more energy and 60% less bloating “in the first 30 days.” The site now says 95% and 85%. The underlying data for neither has been released.
  • The percentages describe how many people in the supplement group reported improvement, not the difference from the control group, which is the comparison that counts.

The Longevity trial, NCT06714162, is thinner still. Despite a title calling it randomized and controlled, the record describes a single-group study with no masking and an estimated 30 participants, testing a “Longevity pill.” At launch, Longevity was a single capsule. Today it’s a powder sachet with a different formula.

Whose Science Is IM8 Borrowing?

IM8’s ingredient claims describe research on individual compounds, not on IM8. Its science page presents a patent-pending “Cell Rejuvenation Technology 8” (CRT8) blend and lists seven ingredients with their benefits: fucoidan, berberine HCl, Haematococcus pluvialis algae (for astaxanthin), trans-resveratrol, spermidine HCl, and two brown seaweed extracts, Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus.

IM8’s own Supplement Facts panel for Essentials PRO tells a different story. It lists CRT8 as a single 100 mg proprietary blend of six ingredients: pomegranate, trans-resveratrol, turmeric, berberine HCl, Haematococcus pluvialis, and spermidine HCl. Fucoidan and both brown seaweed extracts aren’t on it, and we found them in no product in IM8’s U.S. store. The science page is selling ingredients the tub doesn’t contain.

The Longevity product page goes further, saying every ingredient is dosed on published human clinical trials at “therapeutic doses proven effective.” As the next section shows, that’s hard to square with its own spermidine dose.

Were These Doses Ever Tested?

Several of these ingredients have real human evidence. Almost none of it comes from doses IM8’s powder can deliver. That 100 mg is the whole CRT8 blend, shared by six ingredients.

Berberine

This is the strongest ingredient on the list. A 2022 meta-analysis of 37 trials found berberine lowered fasting glucose and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes, and a 2025 meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials found lower triglycerides, fasting glucose, and waist circumference in metabolic syndrome. But classic trials such as Yin and colleagues’ 2008 study used 500 mg three times a day. Essentials contains 100 mg at most.

Longevity uses 100 mg of dihydroberberine, sold as GlucoVantage, a trademark of NNB Nutrition. The main human study is a five-person pilot that found higher blood berberine levels but no change in glucose or insulin. One author disclosed a paid advisory role with NNB Nutrition.

Trans-Resveratrol

A Cochrane review found insufficient evidence for any effect in type 2 diabetes, and a 17-trial blood-pressure meta-analysis found no significant overall effect, with benefits appearing only at 300 mg a day or more and in people with diabetes. Essentials can’t reach 300 mg. Longevity’s 250 mg comes close.

Astaxanthin

A 2021 meta-analysis found oral astaxanthin improved skin moisture and elasticity versus placebo, though not wrinkle depth, and a 2022 meta-analysis found a modest drop in one oxidative-stress marker. Trials used 4 to 6 mg a day (Ito, 2018; Tominaga, 2012). IM8’s algae powder is labeled 3% astaxanthin, so even if the whole 100 mg blend were algae, it would supply 3 mg. Longevity lists “astaxanthin (std. min. 3%)” at 6 mg, wording that leaves unclear whether that’s 6 mg of astaxanthin or of extract.

Spermidine

A cohort study of 829 adults linked higher dietary spermidine to lower mortality. But the best randomized trial, SmartAge, gave older adults 0.9 mg a day for 12 months and found no effect on memory or biomarkers, and a 2023 pharmacokinetic study found even 15 mg a day didn’t raise blood spermidine. No trial has shown Longevity’s 3 mg dose to be effective.

Fucoidan and the Brown Seaweeds

These aren’t on the label, but the research IM8 borrows is thin anyway. A 25-person fucoidan trial at 500 mg a day reported lower LDL and diastolic blood pressure, while a 72-person trial at 1,000 mg a day found no effect on insulin resistance. An 80-person Ascophyllum trial found no change in inflammation.

Bar chart comparing research doses with the most IM8 Essentials PRO could contain: berberine 1,500 mg vs 100 mg or less, resveratrol 300 mg vs 100 mg or less, fucoidan 500 mg vs not on the label, astaxanthin 4 mg vs 3 mg or less. IM8 falls short on every ingredient shown.

IM8 maximums assume each ingredient took the entire 100 mg CRT8 blend, which it can’t; real amounts are lower. Trial doses from Yin 2008, Fogacci 2019, Hernández-Corona 2014, and Ito 2018.

What Does “NSF Certified for Sport” Actually Guarantee?

This is IM8’s most credible claim, and it checks out. NSF announced the certification for Essentials in January 2025, and the NSF Certified for Sport database lists Essentials, Essentials + Hydration, and Daily Ultimate Longevity. The program screens for more than 280 banned substances, tests for contaminants, verifies label amounts, and tests production lots. IM8’s testing page also posts batch certificates.

Two caveats. Certification covers purity and label accuracy, not whether a product works. And “trusted by WADA, NFL, MLB, NHL, and PGA” means those organizations recognize the NSF program. They haven’t endorsed IM8.

How Should You Actually Use It, If at All?

If you buy IM8, treat it as a well-tested multivitamin with extras, not an energy, gut, or longevity treatment.

  • Take one serving a day. With a full multivitamin on board, more isn’t better.
  • Want berberine’s metabolic effects? That means a standalone product at studied doses and a talk with your doctor. IM8’s product page flags possible interactions with diabetes, blood-pressure, and thyroid medications.
  • Drug-tested athletes get a real advantage from the NSF certification.
  • Have thyroid disease? Essentials provides 150 mcg of iodine, and seaweed supplements have caused iodine-related hyperthyroidism in case reports. Check with your doctor.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding? Ask your clinician first.
  • Judge it on something you can measure after 8 to 12 weeks, not on how the first week feels.

What Do Doctors, Integrative Experts, and Influencers Say?

Mainstream Medical

Mainstream bodies are skeptical of all-in-one supplements for healthy adults. The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements notes that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence that multivitamins prevent cardiovascular disease or cancer. The FTC’s health-claims guidance treats randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trials as the expected standard, and says consumer surveys and testimonials are never enough.

Alternative / Integrative

Integrative voices are more open to the ingredients than to the packaging. IM8’s advisory board includes integrative-leaning physicians and a Cedars-Sinai microbiome researcher, and proponents point to the research on berberine and astaxanthin. The NCCIH urges care: “natural” doesn’t mean safe, supplements can interact with medications, and the FDA doesn’t review them before sale. Edzard Ernst, a longtime researcher of complementary medicine, questioned the evidence behind IM8’s claims in 2024.

Influencer / Public

IM8’s marketing leans on celebrity and podcast reach. Beckham is the co-founder and face of the brand, IM8’s site highlights tennis player Aryna Sabalenka, and its advisory board includes podcast hosts such as Simon Hill and Dr. Amy Shah. The dissent comes from dietitians: registered dietitian Abby Langer called IM8 clever marketing wrapped around weak science in July 2026.

Where Does the Evidence End and Marketing Begin?

It’s a familiar pattern: real research on ingredients, borrowed by a product that doesn’t deliver them at tested doses, and sometimes doesn’t deliver them at all. Berberine lowers blood sugar at 1,500 mg a day. That’s true, and it has almost nothing to do with a 100 mg blend of six things.

The trial works the same way. “Randomized, controlled clinical trial” is technically accurate. But a no-treatment control, participants who know what they’re taking, self-reported outcomes, unpublished results, and a formula that’s since changed add up to something closer to a satisfaction survey with a registry number.

What’s left is real: a comprehensive multivitamin, useful amounts of CoQ10 and MSM, probiotics, and some of the most thorough contamination testing in the category. That’s a respectable product. It just isn’t the one the percentages describe.

What Would Change the Verdict?

Three things would move this score. Publishing the Essentials trial in a peer-reviewed journal, with between-group results against a placebo, would be the biggest. Testing the current PRO formula, not its predecessor, would make those results relevant. And disclosing individual CRT8 doses, while matching the science page to the label, would be the easiest fix of all.

What Is IM8’s LyfeiQ?

Credibility Rating: 4/10

  • Ingredient Science: 6/10 — Berberine and astaxanthin have solid human trials; resveratrol, spermidine, and fucoidan are mixed or weak.
  • Dose Transparency: 3/10 — The CRT8 blend is a 100 mg proprietary mix, and the science page lists three ingredients the label doesn’t.
  • Product-Level Evidence: 2/10 — One unpublished, company-sponsored trial with no placebo, unblinded participants, and a formula that’s since been replaced.
  • Purity and Testing: 9/10 — NSF Certified for Sport, verified in NSF’s database, with public batch certificates.
  • Risk-Benefit Ratio: Neutral — Low risk for most healthy adults, but modest expected benefit at a premium price.
  • Medical Consensus: Multivitamins don’t prevent chronic disease in healthy adults, and single-ingredient evidence doesn’t transfer to underdosed blends.

👉 Who should try this: Drug-tested athletes who want an NSF-certified all-in-one, or people who value convenience and are willing to pay for a clean multivitamin.

👉 Who should skip this: Anyone buying it for energy, gut, or longevity results; people on diabetes, blood-pressure, or thyroid medication without a doctor’s okay; and anyone who can get the core nutrients for less.

⚕️ LyfeiQ Score: 4/10 — A clean, carefully tested multivitamin at a premium price. The energy, gut, and longevity claims outrun the evidence, so buy it for convenience, not for the percentages.

Related: Is Neuro Gum’s “Get Smarter” Claim Legit?

Citations

  1. IM8 Health. Science. im8health.com
  2. IM8 Health. Third-Party Tested. im8health.com
  3. Prenetics Global. A 12-week Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Dietary Supplement Powder Formula (Daily Ultimate Essentials) in an Adult Population. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06655597. clinicaltrials.gov
  4. Prenetics Global. A 12-week Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Dietary Supplement in an Adult Population. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06714162. clinicaltrials.gov
  5. NutraIngredients. David Beckham co-launches supplement brand to help people feel their best. November 20, 2024. nutraingredients.com
  6. Prenetics. Prenetics Launches IM8 Daily Ultimate Essentials PRO. February 23, 2026. ir.prenetics.com
  7. IM8 Health. Daily Ultimate Essentials Pro: product page and Supplement Facts panel (ESSV2.0). im8health.com
  8. IM8 Health. Daily Ultimate Longevity: product page and Supplement Facts panel (LNGV2.3). im8health.com
  9. Prenetics. Prenetics’ IM8 Launches Daily Ultimate Longevity. October 8, 2025. ir.prenetics.com
  10. Xie W, et al. Glucose-lowering effect of berberine on type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2022;13:1015045. doi.org
  11. Liu D, et al. Efficacy and safety of berberine on the components of metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2025;16:1572197. doi.org
  12. Yin J, Xing H, Ye J. Efficacy of berberine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2008;57(5):712-717. doi.org
  13. Moon JM, et al. Absorption kinetics of berberine and dihydroberberine and their impact on glycemia: a randomized, controlled, crossover pilot trial. Nutrients. 2022;14(1):124. doi.org
  14. Jeyaraman MM, et al. Resveratrol for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;1:CD011919. doi.org
  15. Fogacci F, et al. Effect of resveratrol on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled, clinical trials. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2019;59(10):1605-1618. doi.org
  16. Zhou X, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of astaxanthin on human skin ageing. Nutrients. 2021;13(9):2917. doi.org
  17. Ma B, et al. Astaxanthin supplementation mildly reduced oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrition Research. 2022;99:40-50. doi.org
  18. Ito N, Seki S, Ueda F. The protective role of astaxanthin for UV-induced skin deterioration in healthy people: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients. 2018;10(7):817. doi.org
  19. Tominaga K, et al. Cosmetic benefits of astaxanthin on humans subjects. Acta Biochimica Polonica. 2012;59(1):43-47. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  20. Kiechl S, et al. Higher spermidine intake is linked to lower mortality: a prospective population-based study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2018;108(2):371-380. doi.org
  21. Schwarz C, et al. Effects of spermidine supplementation on cognition and biomarkers in older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(5):e2213875. doi.org
  22. Senekowitsch S, et al. High-dose spermidine supplementation does not increase spermidine levels in blood plasma and saliva of healthy adults. Nutrients. 2023;15(8):1852. doi.org
  23. Hernández-Corona DM, et al. Effect of fucoidan administration on insulin secretion and insulin resistance in overweight or obese adults. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2014;17(7):830-832. doi.org
  24. Wright CM, et al. Effect of a fucoidan extract on insulin resistance and cardiometabolic markers in obese, nondiabetic subjects: a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2019;25(3):346-352. doi.org
  25. Baldrick FR, et al. Impact of a (poly)phenol-rich extract from the brown algae Ascophyllum nodosum on DNA damage and antioxidant activity in an overweight or obese population: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2018;108(4):688-700. doi.org
  26. NSF. David Beckham Co-Founded Supplements Brand IM8 Earns NSF Certified for Sport. January 21, 2025. nsf.org
  27. NSF Certified for Sport. Certified Products search: IM8. nsfsport.com
  28. Gherbon A, et al. Transient hyperthyroidism following the ingestion of complementary medications containing kelp seaweed: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(37):e17058. doi.org
  29. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Multivitamin/mineral Supplements: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. ods.od.nih.gov
  30. Federal Trade Commission. Health Products Compliance Guidance. ftc.gov
  31. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Using Dietary Supplements Wisely. nccih.nih.gov
  32. Ernst E. David Beckham jumped on the supplement gravy train: a case for the ASA? November 2024. edzardernst.com
  33. Langer A. IM8 Review: Are IM8 Supplements Worth It? July 17, 2026. abbylangernutrition.com

Disclaimer: This content includes personal opinions and interpretations based on available sources and should not replace medical advice. This content includes interpretation of available research and should not replace medical advice. Although the data found in this blog and infographic has been produced and processed from sources believed to be reliable, no warranty expressed or implied can be made regarding the accuracy, completeness, legality or reliability of any such information. This disclaimer applies to any uses of the information whether isolated or aggregate uses thereof.